Miller & Nelson, LLC.

Attorneys & Counselors at Law

125 E 11th St, New York, NY 10003

(123) 123-45678

Please note: The form above requires Elementor Pro. You can, of course, use any other free contact form plugins like Contact form 7 or WPForms.

Practice Areas

What We Do

Corporate Law

Corporate Law (corporations law, company law) deals with the formation and operations of corporations and is related to commercial and contract law.

Federal Courts

The federal judiciary of the United States is one of the three co-equal branches of the federal government of the United States organized under the USConstitution.

Intellectual Property

It refers to creations of the intellect for which a monopoly is assigned to designated owners by law.Intellectual property rights are the protections granted to the creators of IP

Lawyer-bg

In The Court of Law

Corporate Law (corporations law, company law) deals with the formation and operations of corporations and is related to commercial and contract law.

law-02-ab.jpg

Family law

The federal judiciary of the United States is one of the three co-equal branches of the federal government of the United States organized under the USConstitution.

hero_lawb.jpg

Stop a Foreclosure

It refers to creations of the intellect for which a monopoly is assigned to designated owners by law.Intellectual property rights are the protections granted to the creators of IP

Our lawyers will also represent you in civil litigation cases such as divorce.

$254522

recovered for our clients this year

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

$324522

RECOVERED BAIL EXPENSES THIS YEAR

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

They Trust Us

Clients from Defferent countries

Attorney Profiles

The People Behind Miller & Nelson, LLC.

John Miller

Principal Attorney

The term was also used in England and Wales for lawyers who practised in the common law courts. They were officers of the courts and were under judicial supervision. Solicitors, those lawyers who practised in the courts of equity, were considered to be more respectable than attorneys and by the mid-19th century many attorneys were calling themselves solicitors. In 1873, the Supreme Court of Judicature Act abolished the term “attorney”, and attorneys were redesignated solicitors.Attorneys did not generally actually appear as advocates in the higher courts, a role reserved (as it still usually is) for barristers.

In both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, various pre-partition statutes dealing with the whole of Ireland and governing court structures, procedures, and court officers remain in force, such as the Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Ireland) 1877.

Elizabeth Nelson

Principal Attorney

The term was also used in England and Wales for lawyers who practised in the common law courts. They were officers of the courts and were under judicial supervision. Solicitors, those lawyers who practised in the courts of equity, were considered to be more respectable than attorneys and by the mid-19th century many attorneys were calling themselves solicitors. In 1873, the Supreme Court of Judicature Act abolished the term “attorney”, and attorneys were redesignated solicitors.Attorneys did not generally actually appear as advocates in the higher courts, a role reserved (as it still usually is) for barristers.

In both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, various pre-partition statutes dealing with the whole of Ireland and governing court structures, procedures, and court officers remain in force, such as the Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Ireland) 1877.

Our experts have been featured in press numerous times

Maybe it won’t get that far, but those who care about these international law disputes think China and the U.S. are on a collision course because both sides hew closely to contradictory readings of international law. One would assume the conflict won’t go nuclear, because that’s a patently absurd result for economically intertwined nations. Maybe it won’t get that far, but those who care about these international law disputes think China and the U.S. are on a collision course because both sides hew closely to contradictory readings of international law.

Know already what you need?

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aenean molestie lacus ut tristique malesuada.

Contact us now!

  • 7292 Dictum Av. San Antonio MI 47096